8602

Mod 6.4 Togerson

2005-02-22T02:27:00.000-08:00

Torgerson, C.J. & Torgerson, D.J. (2003), ‘ The Design and Conduct of Randomised Controlled Trials in Education: lessons from health care’, Oxford Review of Education , 29(1), 67-80. (AN 9280151)

http://web29.epnet.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/externalframe.asp?tb=1&_ua=shn+1+F5EF&_ug=sid+24868DD8%2D9A18%2D4127%2D9680%2D98A057F86E65%40sessionmgr6+dbs+eric%2Ctfh%2Caph+cp+1+DF6C&_us=frn+1+hs+False+or+Date+ss+SO+sm+KS+sl+%2D1+dstb+KS+mh+1+ri+KAAACBZC00057464+52AB&_uso=hd+False+tg%5B0+%2D+st%5B0+%2DAN++9280151+db%5B2+%2Dtfh+db%5B1+%2Deric+db%5B0+%2Daph+op%5B0+%2D+55D6&fi=aph_9280151_AN&lpdf=true&pdfs=107K&bk=R&tn=1&tp=CP&es=cs%5Fclient%2Easp%3FT%3DP%26P%3DAN%26K%3D9280151%26rn%3D1%26db%3Daph%26is%3D03054985%26sc%3DR%26S%3DR%26D%3Daph%26title%3DOxford%2BReview%2Bof%2BEducation%26year%3D2003%26bk%3D&fn=1&rn=1

Mod 6.2 Popham

2005-02-22T02:19:00.000-08:00

Popham (1993), ‘Reporting evaluation results’. In Popham, W.J. (1993). Educational evaluation (3rd ed.). NeedhamHeights: Allyn & Bacon.

http://www.usq.edu.au/course/material/fet8602/2005_s1/unit_resources/objects/Copyright%20Resource/54/default.pdf

Mod 6.1 Goulding

2005-02-22T02:18:00.000-08:00

Goulding (1984), ‘Analysis and presentation of information’. In Bell, J., Bush, T., Fox, A., Goodey, J., & Goulding, S. (1984). Conducting small-scale investigations in educational management.London: PCP.

http://www.usq.edu.au/course/material/fet8602/2005_s1/unit_resources/objects/Copyright%20Resource/52/default.pdf

Mod 5.7 Zeller

2005-02-22T02:17:00.000-08:00

Zeller, R.A. (1997). Validity. In J.P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational Research, Methodology, and Measurement: An International Handbook (2nd ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press, 822-29.

http://www.usq.edu.au/course/material/fet8602/2005_s1/unit_resources/objects/Copyright%20Resource/43/default.pdf

Mod 5.6 Seale

2005-02-22T02:14:00.000-08:00

Seale, C. (2001) ‘Qualitative methods: validity and reliability’. European Journal of Cancer Care, 10(2), 133–134(AN 4811327)

http://web21.epnet.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/externalframe.asp?tb=1&_ug=sid+B2A43736%2D2DF3%2D46AA%2D8BD8%2DFCA92DD5F14A%40sessionmgr4+dbs+eric%2Ctfh%2Caph+cp+1+E122&_us=frn+1+hs+False+or+Date+ss+SO+sm+KS+sl+%2D1+dstb+KS+mh+1+ri+KAAACBRC00033735+6BC0&_uso=hd+False+tg%5B0+%2D+st%5B0+%2DAN++4811327+db%5B2+%2Dtfh+db%5B1+%2Deric+db%5B0+%2Daph+op%5B0+%2D+1C5F&fi=aph_4811327_AN&lpdf=true&pdfs=39K&bk=R&tn=1&tp=CP&es=cs%5Fclient%2Easp%3FT%3DP%26P%3DAN%26K%3D4811327%26rn%3D1%26db%3Daph%26is%3D09615423%26sc%3DR%26S%3DR%26D%3Daph%26title%3DEuropean%2BJournal%2Bof%2BCancer%2BCare%26year%3D2001%26bk%3D&fn=1&rn=1

Mod 5.4 LeCompte & Goetz

2005-02-22T02:12:00.000-08:00

LeCompte, M. & Goetz, J. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 31-60.

http://www.usq.edu.au/course/material/fet8602/2005_s1/unit_resources/objects/Copyright%20Resource/42/default.pdf

Mod 5.3 Guba

2005-02-22T02:11:00.000-08:00

Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989), ‘Judging the quality of fourth generation evaluation’. In Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. London: Sage.

http://www.usq.edu.au/course/material/fet8602/2005_s1/unit_resources/objects/Copyright%20Resource/41/default.pdf

Mod 5.1 Barker

2005-02-22T01:59:00.000-08:00

Barker M. (2003), ‘Assessing the `Quality' in qualitative research: The case of text-audience relations’ European Journal of Communication, (18)3, 315-335. (AN 10890748 )

http://web29.epnet.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/externalframe.asp?tb=1&_ug=sid+24868DD8%2D9A18%2D4127%2D9680%2D98A057F86E65%40sessionmgr6+dbs+eric%2Ctfh%2Caph+cp+1+DF6C&_us=frn+1+hs+False+or+Date+ss+SO+sm+KS+sl+%2D1+dstb+KS+mh+1+ri+KAAACBZC00057298+2F44&_uso=hd+False+tg%5B0+%2D+st%5B0+%2DAN++10890748+db%5B2+%2Dtfh+db%5B1+%2Deric+db%5B0+%2Daph+op%5B0+%2D+05D4&&issn=02673231&year=2003&vol=18&issue=3&start=315&title=Assessing+the+%27Quality%27+in+Qualitative+Research%2E&aug=Barker%2C+Martin&jo=European+Journal+of+Communication&fn=1&rn=1&eonline=1&bl=T&es=http%3A%2F%2Fejournals%2Eebsco%2Ecom%2FDirect%2Easp%3FAccessToken%3D46B6582SN3T4V62K59KHWL3AOS8TP6P%26Show%3DObject

Mod 4.3 Watling

2005-02-22T01:57:00.000-08:00

Watling, R. & Arlow, M. (2002). ‘ Wishful Thinking: Lessons from the Internal and External Evaluations of an Innovatory Education Project in Northern Ireland’. Evaluation & Research in Education , 16(3): 166-181. (AN 13545407)

http://web29.epnet.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/externalframe.asp?tb=1&_ug=sid+5CE5C92C%2D838E%2D4AA4%2DABBF%2DA3430CBB3FCA%40sessionmgr3+dbs+eric%2Ctfh%2Caph+cp+1+FD07&_us=frn+1+hs+False+or+Date+ss+SO+sm+KS+sl+%2D1+dstb+KS+mh+1+ri+KAAACBZC00057216+23C8&_uso=hd+False+tg%5B0+%2D+st%5B0+%2DAN++13545407+db%5B2+%2Dtfh+db%5B1+%2Deric+db%5B0+%2Daph+op%5B0+%2D+CCBA&fi=aph_13545407_AN&lpdf=true&pdfs=192K&bk=R&tn=1&tp=CP&es=cs%5Fclient%2Easp%3FT%3DP%26P%3DAN%26K%3D13545407%26rn%3D1%26db%3Daph%26is%3D09500790%26sc%3DR%26S%3DR%26D%3Daph%26title%3DEvaluation%2B%2526%2BResearch%2Bin%2BEducation%26year%3D2002%26bk%3D&fn=1&rn=1

Mod 4.2 Tolson

2005-02-22T01:55:00.000-08:00

Tolsen, D. (1999). ‘Practice innovation: A methodological maze’. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 39(2): 381-390. (AN 5903965)

http://web29.epnet.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/citation.asp?tb=1&_ug=sid+5CE5C92C%2D838E%2D4AA4%2DABBF%2DA3430CBB3FCA%40sessionmgr3+dbs+eric%2Ctfh%2Caph+cp+1+FD07&_us=frn+1+hs+False+or+Date+ss+SO+sm+KS+sl+%2D1+dstb+KS+mh+1+ri+KAAACBZC00057198+A1CB&_uso=hd+False+tg%5B0+%2D+st%5B0+%2DAN++5903965+db%5B2+%2Dtfh+db%5B1+%2Deric+db%5B0+%2Daph+op%5B0+%2D+F43D&cf=1&fn=1&rn=1

Mod 3.10 Worthen

2005-02-22T01:49:00.000-08:00

Worthen & Sanders (1987), ‘Alternative evaluation approaches: A summary and comparative analysis’, pp. 144-59. In Worthern, B.R. & Sanders, J.R. (1987). Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Longman.

http://www.usq.edu.au/course/material/fet8602/2005_s1/unit_resources/objects/Copyright%20Resource/34/default.pdf

Mod 3.12

2005-02-22T01:47:00.000-08:00

Worthen & Sanders (1987), ‘Alternative views of evaluation’, pp. 43-61. In Worthern, B.R. & Sanders, J.R. (1987). Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Longman.

http://www.usq.edu.au/course/material/fet8602/2005_s1/unit_resources/objects/Copyright%20Resource/35/default.pdf

Mod 3.6 Noblit

2005-02-22T01:46:00.000-08:00

Noblit & Eaker (1988), ‘Evaluation design as political strategies’, pp. 127-38.

http://www.usq.edu.au/course/material/fet8602/2005_s1/unit_resources/objects/Copyright%20Resource/33/default.pdf

Mod 3.5 Kemp

2005-02-22T01:43:00.000-08:00

Kemp, E (1999). ‘Metaphor as a tool for evaluation’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(1): 81-90. (AN 1672452).

http://web2.epnet.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/citation.asp?tb=1&_ug=sid+9F4FB120%2DA9DB%2D4078%2D8741%2D1DA2EFED75FB%40sessionmgr5+dbs+eric%2Ctfh%2Caph+cp+1+6D1A&_us=frn+1+hs+False+or+Date+ss+SO+sm+KS+sl+%2D1+dstb+KS+mh+1+ri+KAAACBWA00028666+0710&_uso=hd+False+tg%5B0+%2D+st%5B0+%2DAN++1672452+db%5B2+%2Dtfh+db%5B1+%2Deric+db%5B0+%2Daph+op%5B0+%2D+6366&cf=1&fn=1&rn=1

Mod 3.7 Norris

2005-02-22T01:41:00.000-08:00

Norris, N. (1998), ‘Curriculum evaluation revisited’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(2): 207-219. (AN 851432).

http://web2.epnet.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/citation.asp?tb=1&_ug=sid+9F4FB120%2DA9DB%2D4078%2D8741%2D1DA2EFED75FB%40sessionmgr5+dbs+eric%2Ctfh%2Caph+cp+1+6D1A&_us=frn+1+hs+False+or+Date+ss+SO+sm+KS+sl+%2D1+dstb+KS+mh+1+ri+KAAACBWA00028670+E927&_uso=hd+False+tg%5B0+%2D+st%5B0+%2DAN++851432+db%5B2+%2Dtfh+db%5B1+%2Deric+db%5B0+%2Daph+op%5B0+%2D+7806&cf=1&fn=1&rn=1

Mod 3.10 Stake

2005-02-22T01:37:00.000-08:00

Stake, R & Migotsky, C (1997), ‘The evolving synthesis of program value’. Evaluation Practice, 18(2); 89-104. (AN 9708311608)

http://web2.epnet.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/citation.asp?tb=1&_ug=sid+9F4FB120%2DA9DB%2D4078%2D8741%2D1DA2EFED75FB%40sessionmgr5+dbs+eric%2Ctfh%2Caph+cp+1+6D1A&_us=frn+1+hs+False+or+Date+ss+SO+sm+KS+sl+%2D1+dstb+KS+mh+1+ri+KAAACBWA00028676+CC4C&_uso=hd+False+tg%5B0+%2D+st%5B0+%2DAN++9708311608+db%5B2+%2Dtfh+db%5B1+%2Deric+db%5B0+%2Daph+op%5B0+%2D+2E6D&cf=1&fn=1&rn=1

Mod 3.3 Groundwater-Wmith & Nicoll

2005-02-22T00:52:00.000-08:00

Groundwater-Smith & Nicoll (1980), ‘The nature of evaluation'.

http://www.usq.edu.au/course/material/fet8602/2005_s1/unit_resources/objects/Copyright%20Resource/32/default.pdf

Mod 3.1 Benson & Michael

2005-02-22T00:49:00.000-08:00

Benson & Michael (1987), 'Designing evaluation studies: A twenty-year perspective', International Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), pp. 43-56.

http://www.usq.edu.au/course/material/fet8602/2005_s1/unit_resources/objects/Copyright%20Resource/31/default.pdf

Mod 3.4 Henkel

2005-02-22T00:48:00.000-08:00

Henkel, M. (1998), ‘Evaluation in higher education: Conceptual and epistemological foundations’. European Journal of Education, 33(3): 285-297. (AN 1124317).

http://web9.epnet.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/externalframe.asp?tb=1&_ug=sid+5D6D4540%2D1467%2D43AB%2D8048%2D0FD49E6C65A4%40sessionmgr6+dbs+eric%2Ctfh%2Caph+cp+1+D512&_us=frn+1+hs+False+or+Date+ss+SO+sm+KS+sl+%2D1+dstb+KS+mh+1+ri+KAAACB4A00051592+048F&_uso=hd+False+tg%5B0+%2D+st%5B0+%2DAN++1124317+db%5B2+%2Dtfh+db%5B1+%2Deric+db%5B0+%2Daph+op%5B0+%2D+3FBC&fi=aph_1124317_AN&lpdf=true&pdfs=1.2MB&bk=R&tn=1&tp=CP&es=cs%5Fclient%2Easp%3FT%3DP%26P%3DAN%26K%3D1124317%26rn%3D1%26db%3Daph%26is%3D01418211%26sc%3DR%26S%3DR%26D%3Daph%26title%3DEuropean%2BJournal%2Bof%2BEducation%26year%3D1998%26bk%3D&fn=1&rn=1

Mod 2.3 House

2005-02-21T23:04:00.000-08:00

House (1997), Ethics of Evaluation Studies

http://www.usq.edu.au/course/material/fet8602/2005_s1/unit_resources/objects/Copyright%20Resource/21/default.pdf

Mod 2.5

2005-02-21T23:03:00.000-08:00

Smith, J.K. and Hodkinson, P. (2002) ‘Fussing about the nature of educational research: The neo-realists versus the relativists’, British Educational Research Journal, Apr02, 28(2), 291-297. (AN 6574143)

http://web16.epnet.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/externalframe.asp?tb=1&_ug=sid+16DC0913%2D3639%2D4567%2D88E5%2DC447D727A9D3%40sessionmgr5+dbs+eric%2Ctfh%2Caph+cp+1+2536&_us=frn+1+hs+False+or+Date+ss+SO+sm+KS+sl+%2D1+dstb+KS+mh+1+ri+KAAACBYB00028888+AC54&_uso=hd+False+tg%5B0+%2D+st%5B0+%2DAN++6574143+db%5B2+%2Dtfh+db%5B1+%2Deric+db%5B0+%2Daph+op%5B0+%2D+3838&fi=aph_6574143_AN&lpdf=true&pdfs=102K&bk=R&tn=1&tp=CP&es=cs%5Fclient%2Easp%3FT%3DP%26P%3DAN%26K%3D6574143%26rn%3D1%26db%3Daph%26is%3D01411926%26sc%3DR%26S%3DR%26D%3Daph%26title%3DBritish%2BEducational%2BResearch%2BJournal%26year%3D2002%26bk%3D&fn=1&rn=1

Mod 2.4

2005-02-21T23:02:00.000-08:00

Mathison (1998), ‘Commentary: It depends - on what you think you are doing’ American Journal of Evaluation, Winter98, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p74, 5p (AN 711440)

http://web33.epnet.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/citation.asp?tb=1&_ug=sid+6C943FC8%2D334C%2D40C6%2DBA75%2DCAE302CE1B30%40sessionmgr6+dbs+eric%2Ctfh%2Caph+cp+1+99A8&_us=frn+1+hs+False+or+Date+ss+SO+sm+KS+sl+%2D1+dstb+KS+mh+1+ri+KAAACB4C00019891+5720&_uso=hd+False+tg%5B0+%2D+st%5B0+%2DAN++711440+db%5B2+%2Dtfh+db%5B1+%2Deric+db%5B0+%2Daph+op%5B0+%2D+66E0&cf=1&fn=1&rn=1

Mod 2.1

2005-02-21T23:00:00.000-08:00

American Evaluation Association. Guiding principles for evaluators, [Accessed 20 Oct 2004]

2.4 Ramlow

2005-02-21T22:56:00.000-08:00

The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1981), Summary of the "standards for evaluation of educational programs, projects and materials [Accessed 20 Oct 2004]

Mod 1.4 Shadish, W.R. (1998),

2005-02-20T23:41:00.000-08:00

Shadish, W.R. (1998), ‘Evaluation theory is who we are’. American Journal of Evaluation. 19(1): 1-19. (AN 711433)

http://web20.epnet.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/citation.asp?tb=1&_ug=sid+FB393B8B%2D16E0%2D4AB0%2DB6E4%2D55A964FB391C%40sessionmgr3+dbs+eric%2Ctfh%2Caph+cp+1+8227&_us=frn+1+hs+False+or+Date+ss+SO+sm+KS+sl+%2D1+dstb+KS+mh+1+ri+KAAACB3B00049140+D450&_uso=hd+False+tg%5B0+%2D+st%5B0+%2DAN++711433+db%5B2+%2Dtfh+db%5B1+%2Deric+db%5B0+%2Daph+op%5B0+%2D+513E&cf=1&fn=1&rn=1

Popham, W.J. (1993

2005-02-20T23:38:00.000-08:00

Popham, W.J. (1993 ), ‘Educational evaluation: A history without mystery’ pp. 1-21.Educational evaluation (3rd ed.). NeedhamHeights: Allyn & Bacon.

Guba, E.G. & Stufflebeam, D.L. (1970),

2005-02-20T22:30:00.000-08:00

Evaluation: The process of stimulating, aiding and abetting insightful action,

http://www.usq.edu.au/course/material/fet8602/2005_s1/unit_resources/objects/Copyright%20Resource/81/default.pdf